Failing to resolve the twin strikes of the writers’ and display actors guilds in Hollywood will result in “devastating results if it isn’t settled quickly,” IAC and Expedia Chairman Barry Diller mentioned in an interview on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Diller, a former Paramount Footage CEO, predicted a domino impact ought to the twin strikes not resolve rapidly.

“These situations will doubtlessly produce an absolute collapse of a complete business,” he mentioned.

If the studio executives and guilds cannot attain an settlement for a number of extra months, Diller predicted, there can be fewer packages for customers to observe, which is able to result in canceled streaming subscriptions and diminished income for the leisure business. That signifies that by the point the strikes are settled, there will not be sufficient cash to ramp packages again up.

Settling quickly appears unlikely, nonetheless, Diller mentioned, since “there isn’t any belief between the events.”

He pointed to “existential points” together with the rise of synthetic intelligence, on which the guilds have mentioned they need enter on how it is going to be used, in addition to pay disparities between the highest and backside earners within the business.

Diller mentioned to ease that disparity, high studio executives and top-paid actors might take a 25% pay minimize as a “good-faith measure” to attempt to “slender the distinction between those who get extremely paid and those who do not.”

He additionally urged there must be a Sept. 1 “settlement deadline.”

Diller particularly addressed AI within the interview, which he referred to as “overhyped to dying” when it comes to the impression it is going to have on writers’ and display actors’ jobs.

“Writers will get assisted, not changed,” Diller mentioned. “Most of those precise performing crafts, I do not suppose they’re in peril of synthetic intelligence.”

Diller is extra involved concerning the impression of AI on the publishing business, foreshadowing a possible lawsuit with a gaggle of “main publishers,” although he declined to enter specifics, together with when a grievance may very well be filed.

Diller mentioned main AI firms Google and Microsoft “wish to discover a resolution for publishers.”

However, he added, “The issue is additionally they say that the truthful use doctrine of the copyright legislation permits them to suck up all these items. We on the publishing aspect don’t agree with that.”

Microsoft declined to remark and Google didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

AI firms should give you a good enterprise mannequin earlier than ingesting publishers’ copyrighted work, Diller mentioned. He mentioned the scenario is much like publishers’ choice to supply free entry to materials on the web throughout its early days, whereas counting on advert income.

“It took 15 years to get again on paywalls that protected publishers,” Diller mentioned.

“I feel litigation will hopefully result in wise laws right here,” he mentioned. “Until you defend copyright, all is misplaced.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH: Some Hollywood executives reportedly say they are going to let hanging writers ‘go broke’